Tag Archives: TSLA

Quick Take: The Great “Tesla” Hysteria Of 2020

“Let us see how high we can fly before the sun melts the wax in our wings.” – E. O. Wilson

Since January 1, 2020, Tesla’s (TSLA) stock price has risen by $462 or 110%. TSLA’s market cap now exceeds every automaker except for Toyota. In fact, it exceeds not only the combined value of the “big three” automakers GM, Ford, and Chrysler/Fiat, but also companies like Charles Schwab, Target, Deere, Eli Lily, and Marriot to name a few large companies.

Seem crazy? Not as crazy as what comes next. Crazy are the expectations of Catherine Wood of ARK Invest. This well-known “disruptive innovation” based investor put out the following chart showing an expected price of $7,000 in 2024 with a $15,000 upside target.

Siren songs such as the one shown above encourage investors to chase the stock higher with reckless abandon, and maybe that is ARK’s intent. Given their large holding of TSLA, it certainly makes more sense than their price targets. Instead of taking her recommendations with blind faith, here are some statistics to illustrate what is required for TSLA to reach such lofty goals.

To start, let’s compare TSLA to their peer group, the auto industry. The chart below shows that TSLA has the second largest market cap in the auto industry, only behind Toyota. Despite the market cap, its sales are the lowest in the industry and by a lot. According to figures published on their website, TSLA sold 367,500 cars in 2019. General Motors sold 2.9 million and Ford sold 2.4 million.

Clearly investors are betting on the future, so let’s put ARK’s forecast into context.  

If the TSLA share price were to rise to their baseline forecast of 7,000, the market cap would increase to $1.26 trillion. Currently, the auto industry, as shown above, and including TSLA, aggregates to $772 billion. At the upside scenario of 15,000, the market cap of TSLA ($2.7 trillion) would be almost four times the current market cap of the entire auto industry.  More stunning, it would be greater than the combined value of Apple and Microsoft.

Even if we make the ridiculous assumption that TSLA will be the world’s only automaker, a price of 15,000 still implies a valuation that is three to four times the current industry average based on price to sales and price to earnings. At 7,000, its valuation would be 1.6 times the industry average. Again, and we stress, that is if TSLA is the world’s only automaker.


Tesla is one of a few poster children for the latest surge in the current bull market. That said, it’s worth remembering some examples from the past. For instance, Qualcomm (QCOM) was a poster child for the tech boom in the late 1990s. Below is a chart comparing the final surge in QCOM (Q4 1999) to the last three months of trading for TSLA.

In the last quarter of 1999, QCOM’s price rose by 277%. TSLA is only up 181% in the last three months and may catch up to QCOM’s meteoric rise. However, if history is any guide, QCOM likely offers what a textbook example of a blow-off top is. By 2003 QCOM lost 90% of its value and would not recapture the 1999 highs for 15 years. 

Tesla may be the next great automaker and, in doing so, own a sizeable portion of market share. However, to have estimates as high as those proposed by ARK, they must be the only automaker and assume fantastic growth in the number of cars bought worldwide. Given their technology is replicable and given the enormous incentives for competitors, we not only find ARK’s wild forecast exceedingly optimistic, but we believe it is already trading near a best-case scenario level.

One final factor that ARK Invest also seems to have neglected is the risk of an economic downturn. Although they do highlight a “Bear Case” price target of $1,500, that too seems incoherent. Given that TSLA is still losing money and is also heavily indebted, an economic slowdown would raise the risk of their demise. In such an instance, TSLA would probably become the property of one of the major car companies for less than $50 per share.

TSLA’s stock may run higher. Its price is now a function of all the key speculative ingredients – momentum, greed, FOMO, and of course, short covering. The sky always seems to be the limit in the short run, but as Icarus found out, be careful aiming for the sun.

**As we published the article Tesla was up 20% on the day. The one day jump raised their market cap by an amount greater than the respective market caps of KIA, Hyundai, Nissan, and Fiat/Chrysler!!

Kass: For Whom The Bell Tolls ($TSLA)

5-Reasons Why I Doubt Tesla Is Going Private

One of my most important media contacts was Barron’s Alan Abelson.

In time, Alan became a very close friend – I spoke to him nearly every Thursday afternoon for almost two decades. We went to New York Yankee games together and shared a lot professionally and personally.

Some years into our business relationship I sent him a couple of books of fiction that I thought he would enjoy. Very soon thereafter I received a call back from him saying that he doesn’t read fiction anymore because what happens on Wall Street is often much stranger than the best books of fiction.

I Still Bleed Barron’s Blue, and I still remember Alan’s comments about the weird goings on in Wall Street.

And, one of the most bizarre Wall Street events occurred yesterday with Elon Musk declaring his “intention” to take Tesla private (with “funding secured.”).

After more than one hour of a halt in the trading of Tesla’s (TSLA) shares the company has come out with a release confirming Elon Musk’s interest in taking Tesla private at $420/share — a transaction valued at about $72 billion.

I have little doubt there will be NO transaction:

  • To begin with, Elon Musk has a unique sense of humor. The number 420, or 4:20 or 4/20 (pronounced four-twenty) is a code-term in cannabis culture that refers to the consumption of cannabis, especially smoking cannabis around the time 4:20 p.m. (or 16:20 in 24-hour notation) and smoking cannabis in celebration on the date April 20 (which is 4/20 in U.S. form).
  • The company’s fundamentals and balance sheet do not support a leveraged transaction. A LBO is not financeable in the current market and this is the least demanding market in history for financing. Tesla is losing money, has large capital spending requirements, is bleeding cash, has meaningful contingent product liability risks and already has $9 billion of net debt.
  • The only way the LBO could be done is if several large strategic buyers lost their collective minds and invested in the transaction. As best I can ascertain there are no such strategic buyers that exist to support this deal — though many have lost their minds on smaller transactions!
  • There was no mention of investment banking advisors or outside legal counsel in the Tesla statement. This makes me suspect of the proposed transaction. 
  • Musk recently purchased stock in the open market. I presume Musk has been thinking about a going private deal for some time, which raises potential legal (SEC) problems.

As I wrote in my previous post, Elon Musk has gone “off the reservation” after making a choreographed and random tweet yesterday.

Not only do I believe there will be no going private transaction but I suspect Musk has gone too far with his tweets and will likely pay a legal toll for it.